Coffee intake and cancer： an umbrella review of meta-analyses / 上海预防医学

ObjectiveWith the increase in coffee consumption， its impact on health has garnered significant attention. However， the relationship between coffee intake and cancer risk remains controversial in epidemiological studies. To summarize the most reliable evidence on coffee consumption and cancer risk， we conducted a comprehensive review of meta-analyses examining the association between coffee consumption and cancer risk in various populations. MethodsMeta-analyses of observational studies were conducted， utilizing searches of the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify associations between coffee intake and cancer risk. ResultsA total of 24 observational studies comprising 76 non-overlapping associations were included in this umbrella review. Coffee intake was found to be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer， brain cancer， colon cancer， colorectal cancer， endometrial cancer， liver cancer， melanoma， non-melanoma， oral cancer， and oral/pharyngeal cancer. Conversely， coffee intake was associated with a high risk of urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer. ConclusionModerate consumption of coffee has a wide range of potential benefits in reducing the risk of cancer. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials， taking into account other factors that may have contributed to bias， are needed to investigate the association between coffee consumption and cancer in other anatomical sites.

Reevaluation of systematic evaluation of Tripterygium glycosides in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To systematically reevaluate （umbrella review） the systematic review/meta-analysis of Tripterygium glycosides （TG） in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease （DKD）， in order to provide a higher quality evidence-based reference for TG in the treatment of DKD. METHODS The systematic reviews/meta-analysis of TG in the treatment of DKD were searched from CNKI， Wanfang， VIP， CBM， PubMed， Cochrane Library and Embase. The PRISMA 2020 statement， the AMSTAR 2 scale and the GRADE tool were used to evaluate the quality of the report， the quality of the methodology， and the quality of the evidence， respectively. The quantitative results of the included systematic review/meta-analysis were analyzed comprehensively. RESULTS A total of 18 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included. PRISMA 2020 stated that 3 reports were complete， 13 reports had partial information defects， and 2 reports had serious information defects. The results of the AMSTAR 2 scale evaluation showed that 4 literature had low methodological quality， and 14 literature had very low methodological quality. GRADE tool evaluation results showed that there were 106 outcome indicators， including 34 intermediate-quality evidence accounted for 32.1%， 51 poor-quality evidence accounted for 48.1%， 21 very poor-quality evidence accounted for 19.8%， and there was no high- quality evidence. Comprehensive analysis of quantitative results of various outcome indicators showed that TG had definite improvement effects on the total effective rate of DKD， 24-hour urinary protein quantity and serum albumin， and the adverse drug reactions were different in every study. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of TG in the treatment of DKD is relatively accurate， safety still needs to be paid attention to， and future studies with larger sample size need to be verified.

Research status and hotspots of umbrella review based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace / 中华健康管理学杂志

Objective:To analyze the research status of umbrella review by bibliometric methods.Methods:The citation search was performed via Web of Science Core Collection database to obtain studies on umbrella review from inception to December 31, 2021. VOSviewer1.6.16 was used to extract the included authors, countries, institutions and keywords, and generate the cooperative network graph of high-productivity authors, countries, institutions, and clustering graph of high-frequency keywords. CiteSpace5.7.R5W was used to detect burst terms.Results:A total of 755 articles or reviews were included. The quantity of studies had been increasing over time. The United Kingdom was the country with the most published papers (297), and the University of College London was the institution with the most published papers (77). A total of 3 863 authors participated in the umbrella review research, of which Solmi M had the largest number of papers with 28 papers published. The main authors formed three groups, with little cooperation between the groups. Research hotspots focused on chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, mental health and its health management. Besides, diabetes, heart failure and Mediterranean diet were the frontier fields.Conclusions:Umbrella review is in the development stage, and the amount of studies is increasing. The United Kingdom is in a leading position in this field. The members of each team work closely together, but there is a lack of cross-team cooperation. Chronic diseases and their management are currently research hotspots and key research contents.

Appraising the effectiveness of electrical and magnetic brain stimulation techniques in acute major depressive episodes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Electrical and magnetic brain stimulation techniques present distinct mechanisms and efficacy in the acute treatment of depression. This was an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of brain stimulation techniques for managing acute major depressive episodes. A systematic review was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE databases from inception until March 2020. We included the English language meta-analysis with the most randomized controlled trials on the effects of any brain stimulation technique vs. control in adults with an acute depressive episode. Continuous and dichotomous outcomes were assessed. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 was applied and the credibility of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Seven meta-analyses were included (5,615 patients), providing evidence for different modalities of brain stimulation techniques. Three meta-analyses were evaluated as having high methodological quality, three as moderate, and one as low. The highest quality of evidence was found for high frequency-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation, and bilateral rTMS. There is strong clinical research evidence to guide future clinical use of some techniques. Our results confirm the heterogeneity of the effects across these techniques, indicating that different mechanisms of action lead to different efficacy profiles.

Risk factors for eating disorders: an umbrella review of published meta-analyses

Objective: To grade the evidence about risk factors for eating disorders (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder) with an umbrella review approach. Methods: This was a systematic review of observational studies on risk factors for eating disorders published in PubMed/PsycInfo/Embase until December 11th, 2019. We recalculated random-effect meta-analyses, heterogeneity, small-study effect, excess significance bias and 95% prediction intervals, grading significant evidence (p < 0.05) from convincing to weak according to established criteria. Quality was assessed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. Results: Of 2,197 meta-analyses, nine were included, providing evidence on 50 risk factors, 29,272 subjects with eating disorders, and 1,679,385 controls. Although no association was supported by convincing evidence, highly suggestive evidence supported the association between childhood sexual abuse and bulimia nervosa (k = 29, 1,103 cases with eating disorders, 8,496 controls, OR, 2.73, 95%CI 1.96-3.79, p = 2.1 x 10-9, AMSTAR-2 moderate quality) and between appearance-related teasing victimization and any eating disorder (k = 10, 1,341 cases with eating disorders, 3,295 controls, OR 2.91, 95%CI 2.05-4.12, p = 1.8x10-9, AMSTAR-2 moderate quality). Suggestive, weak, or no evidence supported 11, 29, and 8 associations, respectively. Conclusions: The most credible evidence indicates that early traumatic and stressful events are risk factors for eating disorders. Larger collaborative prospective cohort studies are needed to identify risk factors for eating disorders, particularly anorexia nervosa.

Effects of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Inhibitors on the Incidence of Tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors are used as a treatment in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Tuberculosis (TB) risk is reported in several meta-analyses in patients treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to collect, review, and evaluate the TB risk in TNF-alpha inhibitors according to IMIDs indications and between soluble-receptor TNF-alpha inhibitor and monoclonal-antibody TNF-alpha inhibitors. METHODS: A systematic literature search on systematic reviews and meta-analyses was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and EMBASE. We identified meta-analyses that evaluated TB infection risk of TNF-alpha inhibitors in IMIDs patients. RESULTS: Thirteen meta-analyses including 41 study results were included in this umbrella review. IMIDs patients treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors had an increased risk of TB than control group (placebo with or without standard therapy patients) (relative risk ratio (RR) 2.057, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.697 to 2.495). Among them, RA patients with TNF-alpha inhibitors had a higher risk of TB than control group (RR 1.847, 95% CI 1.385 to 2.464), and non-RA patients with TNF-alpha inhibitors had an increased risk of TB (RR 2.236, 95% CI 1.284 to 3.894). In subgroup analysis on TB risk between soluble-receptor TNF-alpha inhibitor and monoclonal-antibody TNF-alpha inhibitors in RA patients, the analysis indicated that monoclonal-antibody TNF-alpha inhibitors had higher risk of TB than solublereceptor TNF-alpha inhibitor (RR 2.880, 95% CI 1.730 to 4.792). CONCLUSION: This umbrella review confirms that the risk of TB is significantly increased in TNF-alpha inhibitor treated patients compared to control group.